<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 681 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283064</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the convictions and sentences of Arnit Das and Sidharth for their roles in a murder conspiracy, with Arnit Das initially sentenced to death but later commuted to life imprisonment. However, the Court acquitted Rohan Prakash due to insufficient evidence, granting him the benefit of doubt. The Court also criticized procedural lapses related to the handling of the case diary, emphasizing the importance of confidentiality in criminal investigations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 17:11:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 681 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283064</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the convictions and sentences of Arnit Das and Sidharth for their roles in a murder conspiracy, with Arnit Das initially sentenced to death but later commuted to life imprisonment. However, the Court acquitted Rohan Prakash due to insufficient evidence, granting him the benefit of doubt. The Court also criticized procedural lapses related to the handling of the case diary, emphasizing the importance of confidentiality in criminal investigations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>