<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 454 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283062</link>
    <description>The court modified the death sentence of the first accused (A-1) to life imprisonment, considering his prior incarceration. A-1 was convicted for causing four deaths and attempting to murder a witness, while accused A-2 was acquitted due to insufficient evidence. The reliability of witness testimonies was affirmed, and the defense&#039;s use of the case diary was deemed illegal. The sentencing procedure was found to violate the CrPC. All sentences were directed to run concurrently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 17:05:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 454 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283062</link>
      <description>The court modified the death sentence of the first accused (A-1) to life imprisonment, considering his prior incarceration. A-1 was convicted for causing four deaths and attempting to murder a witness, while accused A-2 was acquitted due to insufficient evidence. The reliability of witness testimonies was affirmed, and the defense&#039;s use of the case diary was deemed illegal. The sentencing procedure was found to violate the CrPC. All sentences were directed to run concurrently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>