<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 661 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283060</link>
    <description>Investigation material showing meetings with ULFA leaders, negotiation over the organisation&#039;s demands, and support through contributions and other assistance was sufficient to disclose a prima facie case of assistance to an unlawful association under Section 10 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The same material did not establish participation in or assistance to an unlawful activity so as to attract Section 13, nor did it justify the alleged Indian Penal Code offences of conspiracy or offences against the State. Because the Section 10 charge was bailable, anticipatory bail was not available for that offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 16:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 661 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283060</link>
      <description>Investigation material showing meetings with ULFA leaders, negotiation over the organisation&#039;s demands, and support through contributions and other assistance was sufficient to disclose a prima facie case of assistance to an unlawful association under Section 10 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The same material did not establish participation in or assistance to an unlawful activity so as to attract Section 13, nor did it justify the alleged Indian Penal Code offences of conspiracy or offences against the State. Because the Section 10 charge was bailable, anticipatory bail was not available for that offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>