https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283059 The High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 172(3) of the CrPC, which restricts accused access to case diaries. The Court emphasized that accused have alternative avenues to challenge diary contents during trial, ensuring their rights are protected. It highlighted the court's role in examining diaries to safeguard justice interests. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision, balancing accused rights with public interest in criminal investigations and justifying diary access restrictions under the law. The judgment underscores the court's duty to ensure a fair trial and uphold justice and public welfare. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Sep 2019 16:48:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283059 The High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 172(3) of the CrPC, which restricts accused access to case diaries. The Court emphasized that accused have alternative avenues to challenge diary contents during trial, ensuring their rights are protected. It highlighted the court's role in examining diaries to safeguard justice interests. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision, balancing accused rights with public interest in criminal investigations and justifying diary access restrictions under the law. The judgment underscores the court's duty to ensure a fair trial and uphold justice and public welfare. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283059