https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283058 The High Court addressed the issue of judicial restraint in granting interim protection during investigations under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C. While acknowledging the need for judicial restraint, the Court emphasized the importance of balancing propriety with fair hearings. It highlighted the necessity of consistency in decisions across coordinate benches and the obligation to hear petitions on their merits. By considering legal precedent and granting protection in line with established principles, the Court aimed to uphold the rule of law and protect petitioner rights during investigations. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Sep 2019 16:44:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283058 The High Court addressed the issue of judicial restraint in granting interim protection during investigations under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C. While acknowledging the need for judicial restraint, the Court emphasized the importance of balancing propriety with fair hearings. It highlighted the necessity of consistency in decisions across coordinate benches and the obligation to hear petitions on their merits. By considering legal precedent and granting protection in line with established principles, the Court aimed to uphold the rule of law and protect petitioner rights during investigations. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283058