<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1528 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283058</link>
    <description>Interim protection from arrest may be granted where coordinate Benches have already found prima facie substance in similar petitions and granted comparable relief. The Court distinguished broader restraint against interference with investigations and held that, once jurisdictional basis for interim relief exists, appropriate protective orders can still issue. It also relied on judicial propriety, noting that a contrary view should not be taken without hearing the petition on merits when several coordinate Benches had already extended similar protection. The petitioner was therefore given interim protection from arrest, subject to cooperation with the investigation, compliance with summons, attendance requirements, and directions relating to interrogation and recording of statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 16:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1528 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283058</link>
      <description>Interim protection from arrest may be granted where coordinate Benches have already found prima facie substance in similar petitions and granted comparable relief. The Court distinguished broader restraint against interference with investigations and held that, once jurisdictional basis for interim relief exists, appropriate protective orders can still issue. It also relied on judicial propriety, noting that a contrary view should not be taken without hearing the petition on merits when several coordinate Benches had already extended similar protection. The petitioner was therefore given interim protection from arrest, subject to cooperation with the investigation, compliance with summons, attendance requirements, and directions relating to interrogation and recording of statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>