<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 700 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283054</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s decision to grant anticipatory bail to the respondents, which included police officers, politicians, and a businessman, accused of serious offenses under the IPC and the Prevention of Immoral Trafficking Act. The SC emphasized the prosecutrix&#039;s age, the gravity of the accusations, and the respondents&#039; absconding behavior. It highlighted the necessity of custodial interrogation and a thorough investigation. The SC directed the respondents to surrender and apply for regular bail, stressing that the HC erred in its initial judgment. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the need for justice and accountability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 700 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283054</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s decision to grant anticipatory bail to the respondents, which included police officers, politicians, and a businessman, accused of serious offenses under the IPC and the Prevention of Immoral Trafficking Act. The SC emphasized the prosecutrix&#039;s age, the gravity of the accusations, and the respondents&#039; absconding behavior. It highlighted the necessity of custodial interrogation and a thorough investigation. The SC directed the respondents to surrender and apply for regular bail, stressing that the HC erred in its initial judgment. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the need for justice and accountability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>