<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (7) TMI 20 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283051</link>
    <description>An unregistered document creating a lease of the right to collect rents was treated as relating to immovable property, because benefits arising out of land fall within that category, and the instrument embodied the lease terms executed by both parties. As an unregistered lease deed, it could not operate as a completed legal lease, but it was enforceable as a contract to lease where possession had been delivered in part performance. Applying specific performance principles, the court accepted that the plaintiff could recover the agreed rent under the contract despite non-registration, and the suit succeeded on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (7) TMI 20 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283051</link>
      <description>An unregistered document creating a lease of the right to collect rents was treated as relating to immovable property, because benefits arising out of land fall within that category, and the instrument embodied the lease terms executed by both parties. As an unregistered lease deed, it could not operate as a completed legal lease, but it was enforceable as a contract to lease where possession had been delivered in part performance. Applying specific performance principles, the court accepted that the plaintiff could recover the agreed rent under the contract despite non-registration, and the suit succeeded on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>