https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283049 The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to disallow 20% of payments made to subcontractors, as the subcontract work was not carried out by the named individuals but by other parties. The tribunal also upheld the disallowance of excess payments made to specific individuals and the addition of income from the sale of scrap. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and all orders of the CIT(A) were upheld, citing identical facts to the preceding year. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:02:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283049 The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to disallow 20% of payments made to subcontractors, as the subcontract work was not carried out by the named individuals but by other parties. The tribunal also upheld the disallowance of excess payments made to specific individuals and the addition of income from the sale of scrap. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and all orders of the CIT(A) were upheld, citing identical facts to the preceding year. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283049