https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19610 The court allowed the writ application, quashing the impugned orders under Section 269UD of the Income-tax Act. It ruled that the transaction fell under Chapter XX-A, not Chapter XX-C, as the agreements were made before October 1, 1986. The orders were set aside due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice, following the precedent set in C.B. Gautam v. Union of India. No costs were awarded in the case. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:04:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19610 The court allowed the writ application, quashing the impugned orders under Section 269UD of the Income-tax Act. It ruled that the transaction fell under Chapter XX-A, not Chapter XX-C, as the agreements were made before October 1, 1986. The orders were set aside due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice, following the precedent set in C.B. Gautam v. Union of India. No costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19610