<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1919 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283048</link>
    <description>Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is procedural, but extension of time for filing a written statement may be granted only in exceptionally hard cases on a convincing and cogent explanation for delay. Condonation of a delay of more than five years, granted merely on the basis of belated service of summons and a general balance of equities, was held legally unsustainable. The existence of a connected matter between the same parties, where condonation had already been refused on a similar explanation and that refusal had attained finality, reinforced that no contrary view was justified. The condonation was set aside and the application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 21:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1919 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283048</link>
      <description>Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is procedural, but extension of time for filing a written statement may be granted only in exceptionally hard cases on a convincing and cogent explanation for delay. Condonation of a delay of more than five years, granted merely on the basis of belated service of summons and a general balance of equities, was held legally unsustainable. The existence of a connected matter between the same parties, where condonation had already been refused on a similar explanation and that refusal had attained finality, reinforced that no contrary view was justified. The condonation was set aside and the application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>