<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 730 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283043</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the rate of tax applicable to long-term capital gains in block assessments under section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it was not adequately addressed in previous orders. The Court confirmed that income below the taxable limit should not be included in the undisclosed income for the block period, ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 730 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283043</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the rate of tax applicable to long-term capital gains in block assessments under section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it was not adequately addressed in previous orders. The Court confirmed that income below the taxable limit should not be included in the undisclosed income for the block period, ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>