<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1693 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283041</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that Section 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, did not restrict NRI Mobilization expenses claimed by the respondent bank. The court emphasized the importance of consistent application of legal provisions and precedents, highlighting the Revenue&#039;s acceptance of similar claims in prior years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1693 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283041</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that Section 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, did not restrict NRI Mobilization expenses claimed by the respondent bank. The court emphasized the importance of consistent application of legal provisions and precedents, highlighting the Revenue&#039;s acceptance of similar claims in prior years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>