https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283036 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the assessment order under the APVAT Act, 2005, due to a breach of natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner was not given a proper opportunity for a personal hearing during the assessment process, despite submitting necessary documents through their authorized representative. The delay in challenging the order was attributed to valid reasons related to the petitioner's father's illness. The matter was remanded back to the respondents for further proceedings, with the petitioner instructed to file objections within a specified timeframe for a subsequent personal hearing. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2019 13:40:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283036 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the assessment order under the APVAT Act, 2005, due to a breach of natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner was not given a proper opportunity for a personal hearing during the assessment process, despite submitting necessary documents through their authorized representative. The delay in challenging the order was attributed to valid reasons related to the petitioner's father's illness. The matter was remanded back to the respondents for further proceedings, with the petitioner instructed to file objections within a specified timeframe for a subsequent personal hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283036