https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385394 The Delhi High Court upheld the foreign contribution investigation scheme, holding that Section 43 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 and Rule 22 were not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 21 because the governing notification and settled practice supplied a clear policy for selecting specialised investigating agencies. It also rejected the challenge to the CBI reference and FIR, finding that inspection and criminal investigation operated in different fields, the reference was made by the Central Government, and the later FIR concerned distinct offences and a different transaction. The writ petitions were therefore found to be without merit and the impugned action sustained. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2019 09:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385394 The Delhi High Court upheld the foreign contribution investigation scheme, holding that Section 43 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 and Rule 22 were not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 21 because the governing notification and settled practice supplied a clear policy for selecting specialised investigating agencies. It also rejected the challenge to the CBI reference and FIR, finding that inspection and criminal investigation operated in different fields, the reference was made by the Central Government, and the later FIR concerned distinct offences and a different transaction. The writ petitions were therefore found to be without merit and the impugned action sustained. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385394