<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 159 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385391</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to file an affidavit within four weeks regarding the reduction in tax rates on fabric items, with the matter listed for further hearing. The petitioner argued for specific GST rates based on the 15th GST Council Meeting minutes, while the respondent&#039;s counsel contended that the reduced rates applied only to cotton and natural fabric, not all varieties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 159 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385391</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to file an affidavit within four weeks regarding the reduction in tax rates on fabric items, with the matter listed for further hearing. The petitioner argued for specific GST rates based on the 15th GST Council Meeting minutes, while the respondent&#039;s counsel contended that the reduced rates applied only to cotton and natural fabric, not all varieties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>