<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68, noting that the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The revenue failed to disprove the claims or provide material evidence. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the need for thorough investigation and adherence to principles of natural justice in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68, noting that the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The revenue failed to disprove the claims or provide material evidence. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the need for thorough investigation and adherence to principles of natural justice in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>