https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385371 The note concerns a challenge to the jurisdiction of a criminal complaint and summoning order, with reliance on a notification extending jurisdiction to DRI officers. During the proceedings, the investigation was transferred to the DRI Zonal Office at Ludhiana, where the petitioner company's unit was located, and the petitioners furnished documents and cooperated with the investigation. Counsel for the respondents undertook to seek withdrawal of the Ahmedabad complaint within one month. The Court recorded that the respondents would be bound by the stand taken through counsel and disposed of the petition in view of that undertaking. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:15:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385371 The note concerns a challenge to the jurisdiction of a criminal complaint and summoning order, with reliance on a notification extending jurisdiction to DRI officers. During the proceedings, the investigation was transferred to the DRI Zonal Office at Ludhiana, where the petitioner company's unit was located, and the petitioners furnished documents and cooperated with the investigation. Counsel for the respondents undertook to seek withdrawal of the Ahmedabad complaint within one month. The Court recorded that the respondents would be bound by the stand taken through counsel and disposed of the petition in view of that undertaking. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385371