<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 122 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385354</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties due to the revenue neutrality of the transactions and the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 122 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385354</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties due to the revenue neutrality of the transactions and the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>