<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 118 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385350</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD. The demand of service tax under Business Auxiliary Services for threshing and redrying of tobacco leaves was set aside based on a previous judgment upheld by the Apex Court. However, the demand of service tax on GTA Services was upheld, with penalties revoked due to the appellant&#039;s genuine belief regarding the tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:14:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 118 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385350</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD. The demand of service tax under Business Auxiliary Services for threshing and redrying of tobacco leaves was set aside based on a previous judgment upheld by the Apex Court. However, the demand of service tax on GTA Services was upheld, with penalties revoked due to the appellant&#039;s genuine belief regarding the tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>