<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellants Win Refund Claim on Unjust Enrichment; Chartered Accountant Proves Tax Not Passed to NHAI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49094</link>
    <description>Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Retrospective exemption - appellants have failed to produce the letter from NHAI that they have not paid the service tax to the Appellant - As per CA certificate, tax was paid from own pocket- the evidence is sufficient to establish that the service tax has not been passed on to the customer i.e. NHAI by the Appellants - refund allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:13:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 20:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellants Win Refund Claim on Unjust Enrichment; Chartered Accountant Proves Tax Not Passed to NHAI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49094</link>
      <description>Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Retrospective exemption - appellants have failed to produce the letter from NHAI that they have not paid the service tax to the Appellant - As per CA certificate, tax was paid from own pocket- the evidence is sufficient to establish that the service tax has not been passed on to the customer i.e. NHAI by the Appellants - refund allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:13:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>