<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 48 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19591</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee, a private hospital, to claim a 40% depreciation rate for an ambulance van used in their business, despite the Department&#039;s challenge. The Court agreed that the van&#039;s use for hire constituted a business activity integral to the hospital&#039;s operations, justifying the higher depreciation rate. The Court dismissed the Department&#039;s petition, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the 40% depreciation rate under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:00:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 48 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19591</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee, a private hospital, to claim a 40% depreciation rate for an ambulance van used in their business, despite the Department&#039;s challenge. The Court agreed that the van&#039;s use for hire constituted a business activity integral to the hospital&#039;s operations, justifying the higher depreciation rate. The Court dismissed the Department&#039;s petition, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the 40% depreciation rate under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>