https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283015 The High Court of PUNJAB & HARYANA upheld the Tribunal's decision in CEA Nos. 56 and 71 of 2015, dismissing the appeals as no substantial question of law arose. The judgment emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence in proving duty evasion allegations and highlighted the importance of accurate calculations and legal precedents in such cases. The Tribunal set aside the substantial demand and penalty imposed on the respondent's company and its Managing Director due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal of raw materials. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2019 17:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283015 The High Court of PUNJAB & HARYANA upheld the Tribunal's decision in CEA Nos. 56 and 71 of 2015, dismissing the appeals as no substantial question of law arose. The judgment emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence in proving duty evasion allegations and highlighted the importance of accurate calculations and legal precedents in such cases. The Tribunal set aside the substantial demand and penalty imposed on the respondent's company and its Managing Director due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal of raw materials. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283015