<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1319 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283017</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal for the transfer of Sessions Case No. 1006 of 2009 to ensure a fair trial, considering the reasonable apprehensions of bias expressed by the complainant. The dissenting judgment highlighted the lack of sufficient grounds for transfer and emphasized the importance of not ordering transfers based on mere assumptions or presumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1319 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283017</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal for the transfer of Sessions Case No. 1006 of 2009 to ensure a fair trial, considering the reasonable apprehensions of bias expressed by the complainant. The dissenting judgment highlighted the lack of sufficient grounds for transfer and emphasized the importance of not ordering transfers based on mere assumptions or presumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>