<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 640 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283004</link>
    <description>The court set aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Sections 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, due to imperfect sanction for prosecution and reliance on outdated standards for Vitamin &#039;A&#039; content in Vanaspati Ghee. The sanction order was found defective, lacking specifics and public interest considerations, rendering the trial invalid. Additionally, the court recognized the amendment to the standard of Vitamin &#039;A&#039; content, which should have been applied retrospectively to benefit the petitioner. Consequently, the revision petition was allowed, leading to a favorable outcome for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 17:20:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 640 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283004</link>
      <description>The court set aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Sections 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, due to imperfect sanction for prosecution and reliance on outdated standards for Vitamin &#039;A&#039; content in Vanaspati Ghee. The sanction order was found defective, lacking specifics and public interest considerations, rendering the trial invalid. Additionally, the court recognized the amendment to the standard of Vitamin &#039;A&#039; content, which should have been applied retrospectively to benefit the petitioner. Consequently, the revision petition was allowed, leading to a favorable outcome for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>