<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 83 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385315</link>
    <description>The court directed DGFT to make an informed decision within six months, emphasizing that applications cannot be deferred indefinitely due to ongoing investigations. The deficiency letters issued to the petitioner were set aside as they cited ongoing DRI investigations as the sole reason, which was deemed untenable. The petitions were disposed of accordingly, providing clarity on decision-making timelines in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 83 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385315</link>
      <description>The court directed DGFT to make an informed decision within six months, emphasizing that applications cannot be deferred indefinitely due to ongoing investigations. The deficiency letters issued to the petitioner were set aside as they cited ongoing DRI investigations as the sole reason, which was deemed untenable. The petitions were disposed of accordingly, providing clarity on decision-making timelines in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>