<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 72 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to follow proper procedures, including submitting the Appeal to an incorrect address and lack of diligence in verifying its status. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of actively engaging in the appeals process and verifying filing details to avoid adverse outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 72 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to follow proper procedures, including submitting the Appeal to an incorrect address and lack of diligence in verifying its status. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of actively engaging in the appeals process and verifying filing details to avoid adverse outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>