<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 62 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385294</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the revised assessment order issued under Section 22(4) of the TNVAT Act, noting procedural compliance and acceptance of certain objections raised by the petitioner. It found no breach of natural justice principles and emphasized the availability of the statutory appeal remedy under Section 51 of the TNVAT Act, dismissing the writ petition and directing the petitioner to pursue the alternate remedy within the prescribed legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:05:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 62 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385294</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the revised assessment order issued under Section 22(4) of the TNVAT Act, noting procedural compliance and acceptance of certain objections raised by the petitioner. It found no breach of natural justice principles and emphasized the availability of the statutory appeal remedy under Section 51 of the TNVAT Act, dismissing the writ petition and directing the petitioner to pursue the alternate remedy within the prescribed legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>