<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 49 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19580</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the dissolved firm was not liable to be assessed for capital gains as it had ceased to exist and did not conduct any business during the relevant assessment year. The court emphasized that the tax liability would fall on the legal heirs of the deceased partners, in accordance with the relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 49 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19580</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the dissolved firm was not liable to be assessed for capital gains as it had ceased to exist and did not conduct any business during the relevant assessment year. The court emphasized that the tax liability would fall on the legal heirs of the deceased partners, in accordance with the relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>