https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282992 The judgment upheld the award dated 1st March, 2013 in OMPs 665/2013 and 972/2013, directing Respondent No. 2 to pay a specific sum to the Claimant with interest rates specified. Videocon Industries Ltd. was directed to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 20 crores under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, which was later encashed and retained in the account of the Registrar General due to pending insolvency proceedings. The moratorium period under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was applied, limiting further orders. en-us Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Sep 2019 17:49:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282992 The judgment upheld the award dated 1st March, 2013 in OMPs 665/2013 and 972/2013, directing Respondent No. 2 to pay a specific sum to the Claimant with interest rates specified. Videocon Industries Ltd. was directed to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 20 crores under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, which was later encashed and retained in the account of the Registrar General due to pending insolvency proceedings. The moratorium period under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was applied, limiting further orders. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282992