<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1641 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282983</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant on the first and second issues, directing the net profit rate to be maintained at 10% and disallowing additional expenses. However, the Court sided with the Department on the third issue, rejecting the appellant&#039;s plea to allow the Managing Director&#039;s salary as a deduction. As a result, the appeal was partly allowed based on these determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 16:22:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1641 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282983</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant on the first and second issues, directing the net profit rate to be maintained at 10% and disallowing additional expenses. However, the Court sided with the Department on the third issue, rejecting the appellant&#039;s plea to allow the Managing Director&#039;s salary as a deduction. As a result, the appeal was partly allowed based on these determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>