<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1567 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282968</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s decision on the Transportation and Infrastructure Utilisation Fund (TIUF) and bank interest issue, citing past tribunal decisions in favor of the assessee. However, the tribunal remitted the leave encashment issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court decision in Bharat Earth Movers [2000] 245 ITR 428.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1567 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282968</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s decision on the Transportation and Infrastructure Utilisation Fund (TIUF) and bank interest issue, citing past tribunal decisions in favor of the assessee. However, the tribunal remitted the leave encashment issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court decision in Bharat Earth Movers [2000] 245 ITR 428.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>