<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 52 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) were not applicable as the transaction fell within the proviso&#039;s exemption criteria. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeal and concluding that the difference amount was not to be taxed as income from other sources under Section 56(2)(vii)(b). The decision was pronounced on 30th August 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 52 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) were not applicable as the transaction fell within the proviso&#039;s exemption criteria. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeal and concluding that the difference amount was not to be taxed as income from other sources under Section 56(2)(vii)(b). The decision was pronounced on 30th August 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>