<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 47 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A and remanded issues under Sections 40(a)(ia) and 68 for fresh adjudication. The addition under Section 41(1) was vacated, while the addition of the capital receipt was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 47 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A and remanded issues under Sections 40(a)(ia) and 68 for fresh adjudication. The addition under Section 41(1) was vacated, while the addition of the capital receipt was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>