<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385270</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,08,45,000 made by the AO under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found that the assessee had proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the lender, with no adverse material presented by the AO to support the addition. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385270</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,08,45,000 made by the AO under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found that the assessee had proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the lender, with no adverse material presented by the AO to support the addition. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>