<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 25 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385257</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s rejection of the Operational Creditor&#039;s application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to an error in dismissing the case based on the absence of a formal contract. The Tribunal remitted the case for reevaluation, emphasizing the need to ascertain the existence of debt and default without considering the merits of the dispute. The Respondent was offered an opportunity to settle the claim, aligning with the legal framework of the Code. The appeal was allowed, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 25 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385257</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s rejection of the Operational Creditor&#039;s application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to an error in dismissing the case based on the absence of a formal contract. The Tribunal remitted the case for reevaluation, emphasizing the need to ascertain the existence of debt and default without considering the merits of the dispute. The Respondent was offered an opportunity to settle the claim, aligning with the legal framework of the Code. The appeal was allowed, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>