<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 12 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385244</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing adherence to the rule of alternate remedy in fiscal matters. The petitioner was granted the option to pursue the alternate remedy under Section 51 of the TNVAT Act, with a reminder that questions on merits remain open if the alternate remedy is pursued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 07:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 12 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385244</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing adherence to the rule of alternate remedy in fiscal matters. The petitioner was granted the option to pursue the alternate remedy under Section 51 of the TNVAT Act, with a reminder that questions on merits remain open if the alternate remedy is pursued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>