https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385239 The challenge to the order passed by the National Anti-Profiteering Authority under the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017, due to a discrepancy in the composition of members hearing the application was brought before the court. The petitioner argued that the order was invalid as it was passed by four members instead of the three who heard the application, violating natural justice principles. The respondents contended that the discrepancy was a procedural irregularity and not substantive, citing a Supreme Court decision. The court adjourned the matter for further arguments, maintaining any interim relief granted until the next hearing date. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Sep 2019 07:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385239 The challenge to the order passed by the National Anti-Profiteering Authority under the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017, due to a discrepancy in the composition of members hearing the application was brought before the court. The petitioner argued that the order was invalid as it was passed by four members instead of the three who heard the application, violating natural justice principles. The respondents contended that the discrepancy was a procedural irregularity and not substantive, citing a Supreme Court decision. The court adjourned the matter for further arguments, maintaining any interim relief granted until the next hearing date. Case-Laws GST Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385239