https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385238 The court rejected the writ application, upholding the legality of the Warrant of Authorization under Section 132A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the requisition of the cash amount seized by the police justified, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and principles of natural justice. The court highlighted the limited scope of interference under Article 226 and concluded that the authorities followed due process in issuing the warrant. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385238 The court rejected the writ application, upholding the legality of the Warrant of Authorization under Section 132A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the requisition of the cash amount seized by the police justified, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and principles of natural justice. The court highlighted the limited scope of interference under Article 226 and concluded that the authorities followed due process in issuing the warrant. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385238