https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282961 A multi-member statutory authority's decision remained valid where the matter was heard with quorum complete and the governing rules did not require unanimity or a special majority. The record showed that the order was considered by the Chairperson and two members, and the absence of one member's signature after transfer did not vitiate the decision. In the absence of any statutory requirement that all members sign or that the decision be unanimous, the majority view of the members who heard the matter constituted the lawful decision of the authority. The challenge to competency therefore failed, and the majority decision was upheld. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:13:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282961 A multi-member statutory authority's decision remained valid where the matter was heard with quorum complete and the governing rules did not require unanimity or a special majority. The record showed that the order was considered by the Chairperson and two members, and the absence of one member's signature after transfer did not vitiate the decision. In the absence of any statutory requirement that all members sign or that the decision be unanimous, the majority view of the members who heard the matter constituted the lawful decision of the authority. The challenge to competency therefore failed, and the majority decision was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282961