<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1730 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282960</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and that of the first appellate authority, and restored the assessing authority&#039;s order. The rectification was justified as it corrected an error apparent on the face of the record, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of section 172(7).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1730 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282960</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and that of the first appellate authority, and restored the assessing authority&#039;s order. The rectification was justified as it corrected an error apparent on the face of the record, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of section 172(7).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>