<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1690 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282963</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 84,19,646 on account of bogus purchases in the assessment year 2008-09 was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to apply a 12.5% net profit on the alleged bogus purchases, aligning with a previous ruling in the assessee&#039;s case, emphasizing the need for a higher profit estimation based on established precedents in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1690 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282963</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 84,19,646 on account of bogus purchases in the assessment year 2008-09 was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to apply a 12.5% net profit on the alleged bogus purchases, aligning with a previous ruling in the assessee&#039;s case, emphasizing the need for a higher profit estimation based on established precedents in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>