<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1741 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282956</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging the assessment order for the year 2016-17. Despite the petitioner&#039;s failure to utilize the appeal remedy, the court granted an opportunity post-tax payment. The petitioner was directed to treat the order as a show cause notice, submit objections within two weeks, and the respondent was instructed to conduct a reassessment after a personal hearing. No costs were imposed, and the case was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1741 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282956</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging the assessment order for the year 2016-17. Despite the petitioner&#039;s failure to utilize the appeal remedy, the court granted an opportunity post-tax payment. The petitioner was directed to treat the order as a show cause notice, submit objections within two weeks, and the respondent was instructed to conduct a reassessment after a personal hearing. No costs were imposed, and the case was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>