<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 5 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19562</link>
    <description>The court held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner erred in not considering the revised return filed by the petitioner before passing the final assessment order. The court quashed the assessment order and demand notice, directing the Income-tax Officer to complete the assessment proceedings considering the revised return. The petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 5 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19562</link>
      <description>The court held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner erred in not considering the revised return filed by the petitioner before passing the final assessment order. The court quashed the assessment order and demand notice, directing the Income-tax Officer to complete the assessment proceedings considering the revised return. The petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>