https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282947 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the petitioner was not a sub-tenant under the agreement for managing a business and was bound by the eviction decree against the tenant. The Court determined that the agreement did not establish a sub-tenancy as there was no exclusive possession granted to the respondent, and the arrangement was solely for managing the business. The Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, affirming that the petitioner was not entitled to separate consideration in the eviction suit. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:25:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282947 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the petitioner was not a sub-tenant under the agreement for managing a business and was bound by the eviction decree against the tenant. The Court determined that the agreement did not establish a sub-tenancy as there was no exclusive possession granted to the respondent, and the arrangement was solely for managing the business. The Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, affirming that the petitioner was not entitled to separate consideration in the eviction suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282947