<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282942</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the refund claims, directing authorities to process the petitioners&#039; claims and remit the amounts with interest within eight weeks. The court found the payments were made under protest and fell within the exception to the one-year limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, as the transactions were ultimately deemed non-taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282942</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the refund claims, directing authorities to process the petitioners&#039; claims and remit the amounts with interest within eight weeks. The court found the payments were made under protest and fell within the exception to the one-year limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, as the transactions were ultimately deemed non-taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>