https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282938 Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure creates an absolute bar on altering or reviewing a signed judgment or final order, except for clerical or arithmetical correction. Section 482 inherent powers cannot be used to do what the Code expressly forbids, including reopening the merits of a final order or restoring an order already set aside. The Supreme Court therefore held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to modify its earlier final order under Section 482, and the impugned modification order was set aside. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:36:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282938 Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure creates an absolute bar on altering or reviewing a signed judgment or final order, except for clerical or arithmetical correction. Section 482 inherent powers cannot be used to do what the Code expressly forbids, including reopening the merits of a final order or restoring an order already set aside. The Supreme Court therefore held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to modify its earlier final order under Section 482, and the impugned modification order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282938