https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282939 Section 362 CrPC bars alteration or review of a signed judgment or final order except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error, so a later request to dispense with personal appearance could not be entertained after pronouncement. The availability of relief under Section 205 CrPC before the trial court did not permit reopening the concluded order, and inherent power under Section 482 CrPC could not be used to bypass the express statutory prohibition. The request for clarification or dispensation of personal appearance was rejected. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:36:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282939 Section 362 CrPC bars alteration or review of a signed judgment or final order except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error, so a later request to dispense with personal appearance could not be entertained after pronouncement. The availability of relief under Section 205 CrPC before the trial court did not permit reopening the concluded order, and inherent power under Section 482 CrPC could not be used to bypass the express statutory prohibition. The request for clarification or dispensation of personal appearance was rejected. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282939