https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282931 At the stage of framing charges, interference in revision is unwarranted where the materials disclose sufficient grounds to proceed on triable offences. Criminal conspiracy need not be proved by direct evidence; it may be inferred from circumstantial evidence and the surrounding facts showing an agreement to pursue an unlawful design. Applying that standard, the Court found that the record, including the power of attorney and the steps taken in the sale transaction, supported the charges under Sections 409, 420 and 120B IPC. The challenge to the framing of charges therefore failed, and the accused were required to face trial. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 12:16:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282931 At the stage of framing charges, interference in revision is unwarranted where the materials disclose sufficient grounds to proceed on triable offences. Criminal conspiracy need not be proved by direct evidence; it may be inferred from circumstantial evidence and the surrounding facts showing an agreement to pursue an unlawful design. Applying that standard, the Court found that the record, including the power of attorney and the steps taken in the sale transaction, supported the charges under Sections 409, 420 and 120B IPC. The challenge to the framing of charges therefore failed, and the accused were required to face trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282931