<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1075 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282931</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal challenging the framing of charges under Sections 409, 420, 120B IPC. It emphasized the need for charges to be proven beyond reasonable doubt, acknowledged the validity of the High Court&#039;s observations on the power of attorney and conspiracy, and urged expedited trial proceedings while considering any petitions for exemption under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 12:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1075 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282931</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal challenging the framing of charges under Sections 409, 420, 120B IPC. It emphasized the need for charges to be proven beyond reasonable doubt, acknowledged the validity of the High Court&#039;s observations on the power of attorney and conspiracy, and urged expedited trial proceedings while considering any petitions for exemption under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>