https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282929 The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash the respondent's prosecution under the TADA Act. It disagreed with the High Court's view that the TADA Act did not apply, emphasizing the seriousness of the allegations and the need for trial under the TADA Act. The respondent's bail was canceled, and the case was directed to proceed in the Designated Court under the TADA Act. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Bombay High Court's decision. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 11:33:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282929 The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash the respondent's prosecution under the TADA Act. It disagreed with the High Court's view that the TADA Act did not apply, emphasizing the seriousness of the allegations and the need for trial under the TADA Act. The respondent's bail was canceled, and the case was directed to proceed in the Designated Court under the TADA Act. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Bombay High Court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282929