<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 15 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19558</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay addressed issues concerning the interpretation of section 80P(2)(a)(iv) of the Income-tax Act in a case involving a co-operative society. The Court clarified that profits from actual sales to members are exempted income, and the entire profit without computation is not eligible for deduction. The Court answered questions related to deduction entitlement and original intention, ruling in favor of the Revenue. Emphasizing the need for efficiency in legal procedures, the Court decided to answer the questions without further reference to the Tribunal, highlighting the burden of unnecessary litigation. The judgment favored the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 15 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19558</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay addressed issues concerning the interpretation of section 80P(2)(a)(iv) of the Income-tax Act in a case involving a co-operative society. The Court clarified that profits from actual sales to members are exempted income, and the entire profit without computation is not eligible for deduction. The Court answered questions related to deduction entitlement and original intention, ruling in favor of the Revenue. Emphasizing the need for efficiency in legal procedures, the Court decided to answer the questions without further reference to the Tribunal, highlighting the burden of unnecessary litigation. The judgment favored the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>